Become a member of Allies in Recovery and we’ll teach you how to intervene, communicate and guide your loved one toward treatment.Become a member of Allies in Recovery today.

We Keep Paying. He Keeps Returning to Use. How Much Longer?

Kim has watched her son’s struggle with stimulants for years, and has paid for his treatment and housing along the way. Although he’s had repeated success with short-term Partial Hospitalization Programs (PHPs), he starts using again when he moves to a lower level of care. And the bills have added up. Kim wants to continue her support, but worries that she can’t sustain it. Fortunately, there are approaches that could break this cycle. Allies CEO Dominique Simon-Levine has some informed and encouraging suggestions.

Hi, my son has been in and out of recovery and various levels of care for a few years now. He has most recently tried living in a halfway house situation. He does well for a few weeks, has a slip and is out for a few days, and then he is allowed back in if he tests negative for substances. Only to slip again and be out on the street.

I have said no to hotels at this point. I feel it is less safe for him than the streets. I want to support his request to try again but each time, we have to pay two weeks rent and a deposit, which we lose each time he is let go. This is getting costly. I understand that slips happen but there have been several tries. We encouraged him to go to a PHP that takes his insurance where housing is included, and he does, but every time he comes out and goes to a lower level of care, the same cycle occurs.

How do I support his efforts but also stop the bleeding of funds for his housing? Is it appropriate to say we support him but he will have to find a house that will let him pay when he gets a job?


Thank you for writing, Kim. Halfway houses, also called recovery houses (or in the old language, sober homes), offer little in the way of structure and accountability. The individual’s days are free and unsupervised. There may be a house manager; some are self-run. With a safe roof overhead, a motivated person can make constructive use of those days in the community. Others, though, make less effort, feel less able or hopeful, or are less open to recovery. For these people, such free days lead to a wandering mind and body.

The milieu of these houses is so vitally important for every resident. When drug use and misbehavior occur, it disrupts and endangers everyone in the house. Asking someone to leave who has used, however, is not a clinically informed decision for that person. When asked to leave, the person is typically offered admission to detox. And that’s often it.

All recovery houses are not equal

Whether or not to kick someone out for drug use has been a source of debate for years. I was part of a team that evaluated state-funded recovery houses across Massachusetts in the early 2000s, and we asked ourselves this question often. Recurrence and relapse, after all, are part of addiction. But if a person isn’t asked to leave, how equipped is the house to address active use? And how can it guarantee the safety of the other residents, now living with someone who may not be done using?

In the best cases, I have seen homes run with hands-on social accountability and self-governance, like those built on the social model. A good home gives the person a head start by helping them find work to pay for the housing. A house that throws people out for using and keeps the deposit worries me, however. How does a deposit even work in a recovery home? This is the first I’ve ever heard of charging a deposit. People in need of a recovery home don’t typically have the necessary savings.

As the need and popularity for homes has grown, so has the cost, with some houses charging $5000 a month and up­—plus deposit, I gather. Recovery homes at these prices start to look like more structured, privately-funded programs. They often come with chefs, paid housing managers, and other bells and whistles.

What worries me today is that the drugs are making people sicker for longer during withdrawal than those I evaluated in the early 2000s. Your son uses methamphetamines, a drug which, fortunately, still has a low rate of use in the Northeast. But as your son demonstrates, it’s certainly here.

Recovery needs vary person by person—and drug by drug

The current treatment system is designed to step the person down, after 30 days, from a partial-hospitalization program (PHP) to a less intensive recovery home. Thirty days helps most people through the worst of the withdrawals. But not those using drugs like methamphetamines and synthetic opioids like Fentanyl that stay in the system for longer periods of time.

Here’s one way to look at it: after 30 days, your son is likely still in serious withdrawal—quite low in mood, lethargic, and in rough shape overall. Too rough to be hitting the ground running, as is expected of recovery home residents. Your son is 38. We’re likely talking about a long history of drug and alcohol use.

Treatment for methamphetamine is still in its infancy. What we do know is that individuals need to stay in structured care for a long time—nine months or longer—to give the mind and body time to return to health. That process is naturally slow. Of course this varies by individual, but this basic fact is one to keep in mind. It’s not that surprising that your son relapses shortly after admission to a recovery home.

The good news here is that your son does well in PHPs. With a program’s good guard rails to buffer him, he is able to stop using. That makes sense to me and makes me hopeful. At 38, I imagine he must be getting pretty tired of the drug use. Stimulants are brutal on the body.

My hunch is that after 30 days (the average length of stay in a PHP), your son isn’t ready to step down to a recovery home. He needs more time to gain his footing, and more energy before landing in a strange community with days that need to be filled.

Breaking the cycle through longer care

In the current system, he will need to move to a recovery home setting soon enough. But I wonder if next time around your son can be admitted first to an inpatient program (a higher level of care intensity than a PHP), then step down to PHP, and finally, to a recovery home. This would at least buy him those guard rails for an additional 30+ days before moving to a recovery home.

If you are able to adjust his treatment plan on the front end to get those extra 30 days or more with an inpatient rehab, then finding a quality recovery house that is paid for by wages may be open to him. When I read about the troubles with recovery home funding in Vermont, I’m concerned that your son has few choices when it comes to subsidized housing, but such housing does appear to exist. Here is a directory with live updates about wait lists and other details about houses in Vermont. Here also is an article that describes Medicaid-funded rehabs in Vermont. One more resource to check out is this list of recovery communities across Vermont.

When we work with a family, we talk to the recovery communities and coaches about houses in their area. They know the well-run houses and may know of new opportunities not found on websites.

Since your son has faltered and cycled through a PHP more than once, insurance should see that a one-off PHP is not a sufficient level of care for him. This should help you argue for getting the inpatient rehab covered.

Finally, there’s a psychological approach that is showing promise for stimulant use disorder. It’s called contingency management—you can search the Allies member site for more information. The premise of contingency management is that when given a choice, people with addiction often (and surprisingly) choose rewards such as gift cards, money, tokens that can be exchanged for prizes, etc., over their drug.

Specifically, research suggests that contingency management is likely to be a useful component of treatment strategies designed to address methamphetamine use disorders. Researchers have found that in the ability to choose rewards over one’s drug of choice that more abstinent time can be encouraged. Here’s one inpatient place in Vermont that I found that offers contingency management.

I hope you find something useful in all of this, Kim. You’re dealing with big challenges, and I can sense the struggle, but your son is fortunate to have you on his side. My best to you and your family.


Related Posts from "Member Blogs"

Straight to Treatment After Jail? Do I Stick to My Guns?

Sometimes we can see the likely future: our Loved One returns to the shelter of home, hides away in their room, and simply doesn’t get the treatment they need to make progress with their SUD. Allies’ member HelenBo doesn’t want to see that happen with her son, who is struggling with heroin and other substances. What other housing options will he have upon release? As Laurie MacDougall writes, there are often more than we realize. At the same time, such transitions are critical moments for our Loved Ones. Having a list of specific housing and treatment options at hand—along with the CRAFT skills to communicate about them effectively—can make all the difference.

The Season of Expectations

Having expectations for others can be a difficult trap. When we have ideas about how things should go, we often try to manifest those expectations and have other people do what we want them to do. Instead, learn to manage your nervous system, to calm yourself and have tools to make requests of others. Be careful not to superimpose your expectations on others — it might not be what they want, need, or are able to do. That needs to be okay. Learn to give people room to create their own expectations for themselves.

Cutting Him Off Entirely Isn’t the Answer—Is It?

We’ve all heard the argument: cut the cord. Let them sink to rock bottom. They’ve made their bed; now they have to lie in it. Recently, Allies member erinlewis was offered this sort of advice concerning her teenage son. Data and experience have shown that such an approach is usually the wrong one for our Loved Ones—but maintaining a connection doesn’t mean that anything goes. Laurie MacDougall walks us through a CRAFT-informed approach to self-care, boundaries, and the balancing act of connection and accountability.

Interview with Alex Ribbentrop

Alex Ribbentrop joins the Allies in Recovery hosts to discuss intergenerational trauma, substance use, the importance of family, and finding connection. Alex is a Licensed Clinical Social Worker, Qualified Supervisor, EMDR Trained Clinician, and Certified Family Trauma Professional, practicing in Virginia, Maryland, and Florida.

Anger: Why Talking About It With a Purpose (And Not Just Venting) Can Be Healing

Anger evolved with the human brain. Though it may not seem so today, its original function was to keep us safe. Unfortunately, for most of us, anger is a deeply unpleasant experience, one that can damage our relationships and sense of wellbeing. The good news is that we can change this dynamic. This article offers a science-based guide to regulating anger and returning it to its constructive purpose.

When Stepping Back Is the Best Help You Can Give

No one wants a Loved One to suffer. No one wants a Loved One to relapse. But in our worry about such possibilities, we can stumble into behaviors that stand in the way of change—behaviors that make problematic substance use easier for our Loved Ones than it otherwise would be. Fortunately, CRAFT can help us learn to offer support within our chosen boundaries: the kind of support that truly encourages progress.

Filling the Gap

How do you handle that difficult time when your loved one comes home from treatment, and is back in an old environment, complete with old triggers? It can be a time of depression and anxiety. Think about reconnection — being present and engaged, making things fun when you can, and using the CRAFT communication tools to leave doors open.

About This Whole “Engage When They’re Not Using” Business…

If you’ve worked your way through Allies’ eLearning Modules, you’re already familiar with the concept: when our Loved One (LO) is using, we remove rewards and allow for natural consequences. When they’re not using, we reward them right away. But as member BRIGHTSIDE has been finding, the real-life timing can be a challenge. Laurie MacDougall reviews the fundamentals of this process, and shares ideas for getting creative when the lines seem blurred.

What Is Enmeshment?

Enmeshment is a blurring of the boundaries between people. How the other person feels affects you intensely. Enmeshment is one-way — your thoughts, feelings, and choices are about the other person’s well-being. Countering enmeshment means checking in with ourselves, calming our systems down, taking pauses, and allowing the other person the dignity of their own process. You can learn to listen and make reasonable requests and develop a healthier kind of connection.

What Is Our Role? Underlying Feelings and Beliefs We Have About Our Loved Ones

Like many of us who have Loved Ones struggling with SUD, Allies member Binnie knows that trust is a delicate matter. Can we trust our Loved Ones to take care of themselves? Do we believe they have the capacity? Or do we think they’re so damaged that they can’t function without our stepping in? Isabel Cooney reflects on how trust is explored in a recent Allies podcast, and offers her own insightful take on this vital subject.

How Do You Handle Anger?

What’s the impact of emotions on how we interact with loved ones? Learn to acknowledge, claim, and identify your emotions. Don’t discuss anything when you’re reactive. Instead, pause, check in with your feelings, and don’t take things personally. Have a strategy that’s not confrontational or accusing, but engaging. Calm your system and engage in a way that you can feel good about. Hopefully this will reverberate with your loved one and create change over time.

When Song, Faith, and Joy are Enough

The full name of the song is “Ndikhokhele Bawo,” which means “Lead me, Father” in Xhosa. These South African youths, assembled in their school’s courtyard, transform their place of learning into a concert hall with nothing more than the power of their voices. But it’s their spirit of joy and solidarity that lifts the beautiful into the realm of the sublime.

Evidence From Oregon: Decriminalizing Drugs Can’t Solve Every Problem, but It’s an Important Step All the Same

Oregon has just rescinded Measure 110, the historic law that decriminalized possession of small amounts of hard drugs. But the reasoning behind the rollback is muddled. As guest author Christina Dent reveals, M110 took the blame for spikes in lethal overdoses, homelessness, and public drug use, none of which it likely caused. Rather, she argues that the law represented a small but important step forward. In the effort to end the drug crisis, its repeal is a loss.

Ah-Ha Moments

When the noise dissipates and there’s clarity, that’s an “ah-ha moment.” You can move forward in a different way. You might even find new commitment to a way of thinking or behaving that you didn’t have access to before. Allies in Recovery uses CRAFT to give you the tool set for your own ah-ha moments, but also to help create the conditions for your loved one to find their own moments and possibilities for long-term change.

Learning About Depression. And Fighting Back.

Forty percent of Americans will suffer a major depressive episode at some point in their lives. Five percent of the world’s population is suffering from it at any given time. It’s a disease that’s too often misunderstood—when it’s not overlooked entirely. Recovery writer Annie Highwater offers this primer on the many forms depression can take, and the variety of paths available for dealing with it.

What Are the Three Questions?

When you’re in the middle of crisis, feeling reactive or uncertain about what to do, use the “three questions” to helps create space and time and take the best action. What am I feeling? What can I do about it (think as broadly as possible)? What am I actually gonna do? Kayla likes to consider a fourth: What’s happening that’s making me feel this way?

Getting the Most Out of This Site

Personal trainers and the like are terrific—when they’re accessible. Unfortunately, individual counseling is still a rarity with CRAFT, despite its proven effectiveness. Allies in Recovery was created to bridge that gap. In this post, founder and CEO Dominique Simon-Levine outlines the many forms of training, education, and guidance that we offer on this website. We hope it helps you find the support you need.

What We Can and Can’t Control: It’s Good to Know the Difference

Erica2727 has a husband who’s working hard on his recovery, but his place of work concerns her. She would like him to consider various options, but isn’t sure about how to talk over such matters with him. Allies’ writer Laurie MacDougall offers a guide to a vital distinction: on the one hand, what we can and should seek to control; and on the other, what we cannot, and don’t need to burden ourselves with attempting.

How I Boiled Down CRAFT for My Teenage Kids

What can our children make of CRAFT? Allies’ writer Isabel Cooney has a powerful story to share—and some great thoughts for our community about opening a little window on the practice. As her experience suggests, CRAFT may have more to offer than a child or teen can truly take on. But young people may still benefit from an introduction to what the adults in their lives are trying to do.