Become a member of Allies in Recovery and we’ll teach you how to intervene, communicate and guide your loved one toward treatment.Become a member of Allies in Recovery today.

He’s Probably Stealing From Us. Will Confronting Him Do Any Good?

laptop and credit card

Kim has a troubled son. Both he and his girlfriend use alcohol and methamphetamine, and have been living on the edge for quite a while. Now it appears they’ve used Kim’s credit card to get money for drugs, and Kim and her husband are wondering if they should confront him. But this isn’t really about one theft, however painful. It’s about supporting a path to lasting change.

©Karolina Grabowska/Pexels.com

Hello. I would like some guidance in handling a situation we just found out about. We noticed credit card charges that we did not authorize from a pharmacy who had our credit card on file for my son’s medicine only. Clearly someone working the register didn’t see the note that it was only to be used for meds. We have not yet confronted our son except to say that the credit card is not on file anymore. We’re struggling with whether to leave it at that or deduct the $1289 from the $1450 we owe him from his tax return. He is planning on using that money for his November rent but has no job yet. And his unemployment is done, so he will probably get the consequences he deserves at some point anyway. Not sure whether calling him out will just produce more lies and excuses. Thanks for your advice.

Welcome back, Kim.  

The last time you wrote in was March 2021. At that time, your son and his girlfriend were living in an extended-stay motel in another state. They were both using alcohol and stimulants, including methamphetamine.  

If this is still the situation, then your son probably did use your card for drugs. Dealers often trade goods for drugs—even dealers need diapers, or they just sell the items. Since the purchase was made on your card, he probably can’t return the items, which is yet another tactic when trying to get money out of merchandise.  

You’re facing a decision no one would envy 

Their unemployment assistance has run out. Things must be even more desperate for the two of them. Coming home with the girlfriend is not something your family can handle. This is a difficult and important decision. You’re not willing to sacrifice your family’s peace, which is very understandable. Your son and his girlfriend are active in their drug use and are now stealing from you.  

Do they have a list of shelters in their area? Does the list include anything inpatient or residential? You will have to help them both get into treatment if you can. 

The natural consequence would be to deduct the credit card purchases from his tax refund. Do you feel you can do this? Of course it would further squeeze them financially. The loss of housing and money for drugs could become so uncomfortable that one or both goes into treatment.  

A simple move could be your best one right now 

What if you simply provided them that list? You’d want it to include any recovery community centers in their area. These are very low-threshold destinations where they can go to get warm, get a coffee, and talk to someone about housing and recovery and what they can do. Here’s the center for the Northeast Kingdom

In all of this, your comfort level comes first. If you can’t see holding back the money from his return, then let it go. The lack of unemployment makes their situation very bad. If they keep the money they took from you, the scenario I describe would, at most, be delayed by a month. 

Perhaps you say nothing. Just send that list with a brief note: “Hey, here’s an updated list of places you and your girlfriend can go for help.”  

Be ready for the storm 

You should prepare yourselves, however, by blocking any other way he can take advantage of your financial assistance. Is there another way to pay for his medications? Your son may continue to steal or otherwise get into trouble to keep going. So brace yourself.  

Being held in jail pre-trial would not be such a bad outcome. It would put a hard stop to the methamphetamine and alcohol use. And depending on the jurisdiction, he could be mandated to treatment. 

There’s one other thing I want to mention. If we’re reasonably sure how things will play out without their unemployment money—loss of hotel first, then lack of money for drugs and alcohol—I’d rather see that happen in November than December, given the weather in Vermont. Regardless, I hope this resolves in a healing way.  

I’m sorry that you are still going through this, Kim. I’m glad you wrote in with your question. Be well and stay in touch. 

Loading

Related Posts from "Discussion Blog"

What Do We Have to Look Forward To?

Supporting a Loved one with SUD means different things to different people. Meggie, for example, comes from a family that’s confronted the disorder through “tough love”—leaving the Loved One to deal with their addiction entirely alone. This never felt right to Meggie, who wanted to fight alongside her husband for his recovery. When she discovered CRAFT, she soon realized it was designed to help her do just that. Nonetheless, thoughts of the future still leave her anxious. What if he’s in and out of jail for a long time to come? Isabel Cooney reminds us that so much depends on what we tell ourselves about both the present and the possible future.

Straight to Treatment After Jail? Do I Stick to My Guns?

Sometimes we can see the likely future: our Loved One returns to the shelter of home, hides away in their room, and simply doesn’t get the treatment they need to make progress with their SUD. Allies’ member HelenBo doesn’t want to see that happen with her son, who is struggling with heroin and other substances. What other housing options will he have upon release? As Laurie MacDougall writes, there are often more than we realize. At the same time, such transitions are critical moments for our Loved Ones. Having a list of specific housing and treatment options at hand—along with the CRAFT skills to communicate about them effectively—can make all the difference.

Cutting Him Off Entirely Isn’t the Answer—Is It?

We’ve all heard the argument: cut the cord. Let them sink to rock bottom. They’ve made their bed; now they have to lie in it. Recently, Allies member erinlewis was offered this sort of advice concerning her teenage son. Data and experience have shown that such an approach is usually the wrong one for our Loved Ones—but maintaining a connection doesn’t mean that anything goes. Laurie MacDougall walks us through a CRAFT-informed approach to self-care, boundaries, and the balancing act of connection and accountability.

When Stepping Back Is the Best Help You Can Give

No one wants a Loved One to suffer. No one wants a Loved One to relapse. But in our worry about such possibilities, we can stumble into behaviors that stand in the way of change—behaviors that make problematic substance use easier for our Loved Ones than it otherwise would be. Fortunately, CRAFT can help us learn to offer support within our chosen boundaries: the kind of support that truly encourages progress.

About This Whole “Engage When They’re Not Using” Business…

If you’ve worked your way through Allies’ eLearning Modules, you’re already familiar with the concept: when our Loved One (LO) is using, we remove rewards and allow for natural consequences. When they’re not using, we reward them right away. But as member BRIGHTSIDE has been finding, the real-life timing can be a challenge. Laurie MacDougall reviews the fundamentals of this process, and shares ideas for getting creative when the lines seem blurred.

What Is Our Role? Underlying Feelings and Beliefs We Have About Our Loved Ones

Like many of us who have Loved Ones struggling with SUD, Allies member Binnie knows that trust is a delicate matter. Can we trust our Loved Ones to take care of themselves? Do we believe they have the capacity? Or do we think they’re so damaged that they can’t function without our stepping in? Isabel Cooney reflects on how trust is explored in a recent Allies podcast, and offers her own insightful take on this vital subject.

Evidence From Oregon: Decriminalizing Drugs Can’t Solve Every Problem, but It’s an Important Step All the Same

Oregon has just rescinded Measure 110, the historic law that decriminalized possession of small amounts of hard drugs. But the reasoning behind the rollback is muddled. As guest author Christina Dent reveals, M110 took the blame for spikes in lethal overdoses, homelessness, and public drug use, none of which it likely caused. Rather, she argues that the law represented a small but important step forward. In the effort to end the drug crisis, its repeal is a loss.